"we appear to find ourselves at a point of transition between two civilizational narratives: the "old world order" of so called "traditional" autority structures - what was initially simply a sense of duty to one's kin, over time becoming increasingly coercive, with allegiances redirected to favour ruling elites, religion and the state, and enforced by the physical suppression of dissent, and the presently encroaching globalist "new world order" of self-centered individualism, instand gratification and resuitant pernicius debt-slavery, brought through seduction. today there are many who strive for a restoration of the "old world order" values, whistl seemigly failing to notice how those values constitute a corruption of what they once signified, or indeed how changes in human conciousness have made their corruption inevitable. Meanwhile , those who oppose them in turn usually fail to see how the "new world order" values that they typically espouse amount to much the same thing albeit in a differnt flavour: a narrative employed to justify oligarchy - and thus the heart of the matter is never addressed. As Ezra Pount reputedly pointed out, "the techinique of infamy is to invent two lies and to get people to argue heatedly over which one of them is true." Adam Ormes, Tribes, The Challenge of National Anarchism